Thanks for writing
Mariela; sure it would, completely agree. I just read stuff, experience and draws possebilities/views out from that. To me that article was a load of proof, combined with my experences and what I find logical.
Sure, it's just to test. I just guess there isn't so many who have done reserch/had the money to do big reserch. But one can just take an ovulation test every month, yes. I see your point and all. To me, with the article with peoples testemonials and my own experiences I just don't see the need, personally, to take those kind of test. But yes, ofcourse, if people who don't do these experiences read this, it might sound weird, I see that.
I'm not all into what is right and wrong about what we have eaten before and all. Sure, we have eaten meat a long time and all. But I'm convinced that we are not meat eaters, just because when we compare our bodies to all the other animals bodies, we look like frugivores, and not meat eaters. You know, regardless of how long we have eaten meat and how coocked food developed us..
By the way, what did you mean with this: "the advent of cooking technologies drastically changed the physical structure of the human body due to not needing to digest a completely raw diet" ? I just didn't understand that. The point with raw food is that the body CAN digest it, and that the body can't optimally digest coocked food.. It's not a matter of needing or not. Sure we can eat whatever, but we don't get optimal of that.
Did you mean that you couldn't put a link in here? I didn't understand..
I think the article has some weekneses, like when personal experience is done to a scientific truth. But to me that just goes to stuff like: "You'll be thinner than most people" etc. I'm thin you know, but I have friends who are thinner. So..
By the way, this is an interesting article on the subject, more "humble":
living-foods dot com /articles/
femalebalance.html
Hug it together, i'm not allowed to link yet...